https://rmdd.uchile.cl/index.php/RTI <p>Revista Tribuna Internacional is a publication from the International Law Department of the University of Chile's Law School. The journal's main purpose is to encourage the study, discussion, analysis and communication of international law in a pluralistic and scientifically rigorous manner. There are two issues each year with the papers and other contributions accepted during the semester. Our call for papers is open to unpublished scholarly contributions, essays, case-law's comments and book reviews in the fields of international public law, international private law, international relations and international human rights law. Peer review. We receive works writing in Spanish and English. The journal is indexed in DOAJ and LATINDEX directory.</p> es-ES <div id="copyrightNotice"> <h3>Copyright Notice</h3> <p>The articles published in Revista Tribuna Internacional will be comprehensively available for its free download in the website of University of Chile’s journals (www.revistas.uchile.cl). A reduced number of books might be printed for publicity in special occasions, they will be distributed by the International Law Department of the University of Chile’s Law Faculty. The authors that publish in the journal authorize the reproduction of the publication’s content, if the author is recognized and quoted, no modifications are made to the work and it is not used for commercial means. Revista Tribuna Internacional is edited under a license Creative Commons Attribution Sharing Equal 4.0 Internacional.</p> <div class="separator">&nbsp;</div> </div> <div id="privacyStatement"> <h3>Privacy Statement</h3> <p>The names and e-mail addresses introduced in Revista Tribuna Internacional will be used exclusively for declaratory means by this journal, and will not be available for any other means or people.</p> </div> revistatribuna@derecho.uchile.cl (Luis Valentín Ferrada Walker) ccalabrano@uchile.cl (Dirección de Servicios de Información y Bibliotecas (SISIB)) Sat, 30 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.8 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 https://rmdd.uchile.cl/index.php/RTI/article/view/72007 In this paper we will study the deontological content of the Nuremberg trials of the judges. To guide our reflections, we formulate the following research question: What were the deontological-valuative foundations that justified the planning and execution of the trial of the Nazi jurists, which dismantles the argument according to which it is suggested that it was a political trial of revenge against the vanquished? Our hypothesis assumes that the trial of the judges and prosecutors was justified because the Nazis used the judicial apparatus as a means of persecution, intimidation and execution against opponents, Jews and anyone suspected of threatening the hegemonic power wielded by Adolf Hitler and his followers. We are guided by the following specific research objectives: 1- To study the structure of the National Socialist legal system. 2- To review the deontological content of the trial against the Nazi judges and prosecutors and, 3- To understand the evaluative legitimacy of the trial in the face of law and history. For the review of the literature and secondary sources, we will use the hermeneutic-interpretative methodology of Malpas (2015) with a qualitative historical-hermeneutic approach. We will be assisted by the theoretical formulations of Gustav Radbruch and the analytical philosophy of law presented by Ricardo Guastini. Luis Manuel Marcano Salazar Copyright (c) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ https://rmdd.uchile.cl/index.php/RTI/article/view/72007 Sat, 30 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000 https://rmdd.uchile.cl/index.php/RTI/article/view/72106 In this article, I deconstruct the legal science of Alejandro Alvarez – a Chilean jurist – and Carl Schmitt – a German constitutional and international law scholar – to represent the normative traces of the theoretical construct of regional international law. The article revisits Schmittian grossräume theory and Alvarez's American international law as empirical evidence of normative deliberations of regionalism's functionality in international law. It then comparatively concludes that both theories that hinge on the Monroe doctrine have envisioned distinct patterns of regional international law: vertical-apologetic and horizontal-utopian. It finally elucidates the contemporary relevance of revisiting their scholarship on regional international law in the 21st century. Artur Simonyan Copyright (c) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ https://rmdd.uchile.cl/index.php/RTI/article/view/72106 Sat, 30 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000